But this one caught me off guard.
Now, to be fair, she was using a VPN and that failed on her, so she was wondering if there was issues in the office. Still, that has got to be the strangest instant message I've ever received.
Because someone has to correct your terribly misguided ways.
Now, to be fair, she was using a VPN and that failed on her, so she was wondering if there was issues in the office. Still, that has got to be the strangest instant message I've ever received.
Then how about the slap bracelets, the stress balls, the plates, napkins and banners and dozens of other items all emblazoned "Happy Birthday Jesus".
If that doesn't strike you as strange, how about the "Jesus loves you snow much" football or "Jingle for Jesus" bracelets, complete with jingle bells?
But lest we not feel like turning over the money changer's tables just yet, here's a final cherry:
This comes from the section titled, "All Aboard for Jesus".
Hilarious? yes.
Awful? Oh yeah.
Today was the emergency room tort reform bill in HHS ; HB 338.
There are two sides to this, one is very tragic, and one is very pragmatic.
The examples given of malpractice during today's hearing were, well, viceral. "Good hell, how does that happen?" went through my mind once or twice when I heard some of the discriptions of what doctors did by accident.
But I noticed that all there were no Malpractice defense lawyers at the hearing; just the litigators for victims of malpractice. There were also doctors there who think that being sued constantly results in no doctors wanting to work in the ER. They said that it certainly kept specialists who, apparently, are realy important to have on hand out of the ER.
So let's say we table the bill's opponent argument that 338 is "defacto immunity" for ER workers. And let's look at the noticed parts of the issue.
I don't believe that these doctors intentionally screwing people up.
And, frankly, at a standard rate of 33% of damages, I think that the motives of litigators who oppose this bill are not exactly altruistic.
I guess I don't know the answer to how malpractice torts can be reformed. Probably because I'm not a lawyer, a doctor, or a tort-reformer. (Although I have considered being an Indian chief.) Doctors do need accountability, and our juris system needs someone to blame so damages can be awarded.
All I'm saying is something strange is afoot at the Circle-K.
Tell me, my friends, if a bill that proposes to let the under insured get access to a vaccine that PREVENTS CANCER comes before you, (HB 358, heard in HHS standing committee today) would you amend the bill to only educate those people about the vaccine, but not give those who can't afford it the vaccine?
Good job, Rep. Ray. Way to provide for the very poor and the rich, and nail the middle class kids to a tree.
Can someone really think that even kids who are raised in a strong LDS home don't have a chance of making a mistake and, at some time, getting it on, ergo risking catching HPV, the virus that leads to cervical cancer?
Why would you want to restrict access to this vaccine? I ask because that is the affect of The HHS standing committee’s recommendation today.
How arrogant can of a human being would one have to be to suggest that providing a vaccine could condone an action (I’m looking at you Eagle Forum; shame on you for this one), ergo it is better that they be placed at in increased risk of death?
Would you really rather see children suffer for their mistakes than risk yourself being held responsible for condoning those mistakes? Selfish, unwise, and un-Christ-like.
Acknowledging that even good kids make mistakes isn't promoting teen sex. Geez, protect your kids.
And I'd like to add a personal perspective. Having been in many-a bishopric meeting, I can say people make mistakes. This is the point of the LDS church: to help them, to keep them, to watch over them, to care for them, as the Master would. Never are we to take away the chance for redemption because you were to afraid that by telling them that they could repent of a sin that you were encouraging them to sin in the first place.
So I took a job with a newspaper doing legislative reporting.
Well, perhaps it can be described other ways.
The Utah Legislature:
The Nexus of Nuts
The Cross Roads of Inanity
Logic Interupted
Reason Referendum
Normality Disaffected
Libertarian Fascists (note juxtaposition, if you please)
The point is, that there seems to be a durth of measurment in some legislative approaches. I'll cite Rep. Scott Wyatt as one who must have gotten a yard stick of prudence for Christmas.
Wyatt actually took a bill that sought to ban gay clubs in schools, which was way over kill in it's approach, and stepped it back to let parents deal with their own children.
Bravo Scott. It is prudent that simple clubs not be burdened by 16 pages of regulations, including requisite approval of all guests (e.g. a chess master to a chess club or an Armenian professor to a foreign language club) and approval of all handouts by school administrators.
I promise that this is, perhaps, one of the lest egregious examples of crazy.
Violent Video Game Crazy, and the Man Who Almost Sounded Believeable
or
How to Get Your Ass Sued for Liable*
I prefer the day anti-violent-video game activist Jack Thompson called and basically said that
This over an argument was that a bill up for a vote was constitutional; a bill which mirrors ones that have been declared unconstitutional something like 16 times in 8 states.
Thompson calls up and declares the Utah AG "a jackass" and further called for the impeachemnt of the Utah AG because he told legislators that similar bills have been found unconstitutional in other states. And it came with a news release.
So I call the Utah AG and ask him about it. I get something along the lines of "no I didn't call him. . . but I'd sure like to chat with him. Do you have his phone number?"
Oh, Jack, if your going to say that someone called up sounding drunk and send out a news release, maybe you should know that 1) Mark Shurtleff doesn't drink and 2) get a phone record to make it sound a little less like you're making it up - they're easy to get. Call up AT&T and say, "hey, can I have a copy of my bill?"
Why, oh why must these things be?
In short, Please, Please, let's measure our attempts to push through our personal beliefs against the possibility that we might not know and understand all that goes on around us.
Dare I say, only God himself is qualified to speak in absolutes. And I am too, but only in order to say that only God gets to do so. (And I'll reserve the oppertunity to do one more absolute later on.)
A short list of my favorite "crazy" issues.
To be on this list, it should be an issue that is either strange that it exists, odd in how it is being approached, or a fix that is so far from the mark of good judgment that it completely misses the social / governmental / societal problem.